OLM KNOWLEDGE · LEGAL GUIDE

Shareholders agreements in Kenya: a practical guide

A shareholders agreement in Kenya is the contract that governs how the owners of a company deal with each other. It sits alongside the company’s articles of association and covers the questions that cause disputes: who can sell their shares, who decides the big things, and what happens when owners fall out. This guide explains what a shareholders agreement does, its key clauses, and why to put one in place early.

John Maina, Partner at OLM Law Advocates LLP By John Maina, Partner, OLM Law Advocates LLP. Advocate of the High Court of Kenya.

At a glance

  • A shareholders agreement is a private contract between a company’s shareholders that governs their relationship, alongside the company’s articles of association.
  • It covers matters the articles usually do not, such as reserved decisions, share transfers, tag-along and drag-along rights, dividend policy, board representation and exit.
  • Unlike the articles, a shareholders agreement is private and is not filed with the Registrar or placed on the public record.
  • The agreement and the articles should be aligned, because the articles bind the company while the agreement binds the shareholders who sign it.
  • Put one in place at the outset, when the shareholders are aligned, rather than after a dispute has arisen.

Who this guide is for

This guide is for founders going into business together, investors taking a stake in a company, joint-venture partners, and family businesses planning for the next generation. If you are choosing a vehicle rather than agreeing terms, see our guides to company registration and to partnership and LLP registration in Kenya.

What a shareholders agreement is, and how it differs from the articles

Every Kenyan company has articles of association, the constitutional document registered under the Companies Act, 2015. The articles bind the company and its members, and they are on the public record. A shareholders agreement is different. It is a private contract between some or all of the shareholders, and often the company, dealing with how they will run and eventually exit the business.

The two documents do different jobs. The articles set the company’s constitution; the shareholders agreement sets the deal between the owners. Because the agreement is private, it can carry commercially sensitive terms, such as who has a veto or how the business will be valued on an exit, that the shareholders would not want on the public file. In our view most companies with more than one real owner should have both, drafted to work together.

Feature Articles of association Shareholders agreement
Nature Constitutional document of the company Private contract between shareholders
Public? Filed and on the public record Private, not filed
Binds The company and all its members The shareholders who sign it
Typical content Share capital, directors’ powers, meetings Reserved matters, share transfers, exit, dividends
Changed by Special resolution Agreement of the parties

Why have one

A shareholders agreement earns its keep when things are going well and, more importantly, when they are not. It sets out how decisions are made, so a minority is not simply outvoted on the things that matter to it, and a majority is not held to ransom on the things that matter to it. It controls who can become a shareholder, so the others are not landed with an unwanted co-owner. And it plans the exit, so a departing shareholder, a deadlock or a sale is handled by a mechanism agreed in advance rather than fought over later. The cost of drafting one at the start is small against the cost of a dispute without one.

The key clauses

A well-drafted shareholders agreement usually covers:

  • Reserved matters. A list of decisions that need a higher level of consent, such as issuing new shares, borrowing above a limit, or changing the business, so significant steps are not taken over a shareholder’s head.
  • Share transfers and pre-emption. Rules on when and to whom shares can be sold, usually giving the other shareholders the first right to buy before an outsider can.
  • Tag-along and drag-along rights. Tag-along lets a minority join a sale on the same terms as a selling majority; drag-along lets a majority require a minority to sell so a whole-company sale can complete.
  • Board composition. Who can appoint directors, and how the board is balanced between the shareholders.
  • Dividend policy. How and when profits are distributed, rather than leaving it entirely to the board.
  • Deadlock. A mechanism for breaking a genuine deadlock between equal owners, so the business is not paralysed.
  • Exit. How a shareholder leaves, how shares are valued, and what happens on a sale of the company.
  • Restrictive covenants and confidentiality. Protecting the business from a departing shareholder competing or misusing information.

How this sits with the articles and the law

The agreement and the articles must be read together, and where they could conflict the drafting should make clear which governs. The articles bind the company and are the document a third party sees; the agreement binds the shareholders who sign it and carries the commercial detail. In our view the two are best drafted as a pair, so a reserved matter in the agreement is reflected in the way the articles allocate power, rather than the two pulling in different directions.

Common questions

Is a shareholders agreement compulsory? No. It is optional, but for any company with more than one real owner it is strongly advisable.

Is it filed anywhere? No. Unlike the articles, it is private and is not filed with the Registrar.

What is the difference from the articles? The articles are the company’s public constitution; the agreement is a private contract between the shareholders carrying the commercial deal.

When should we put one in place? At the outset, while the shareholders are aligned. Agreeing terms after a dispute has started is far harder.

Do we still need one if we have detailed articles? Usually yes, because the articles are public and cannot easily carry sensitive commercial terms, and because the agreement can bind the shareholders in ways the articles do not.

Common pitfalls

The most common mistake is not having an agreement at all, and relying on the statutory defaults and the articles, which say nothing about who buys a departing owner’s shares or how a deadlock is broken. Next is an agreement that contradicts the articles, so the two documents fight each other. Others copy a generic template that does not reflect the actual deal, or leave out the exit and valuation mechanism, which is exactly the part that matters when a shareholder wants out. And a minority shareholder who signs without securing reserved-matter protection can find its investment controlled entirely by the majority.

What you should do now

  • If your company has more than one owner and no shareholders agreement, treat putting one in place as a priority.
  • Agree the commercial points first: control, share transfers, dividends and exit.
  • Draft the agreement and the articles together so they are consistent.
  • If you are a minority, secure reserved-matter and tag-along protection before you sign.
  • Review the agreement when the shareholding changes or an investor comes in.

How OLM Law can help

Our corporate and commercial team drafts and negotiates shareholders agreements, joint-venture agreements and the matching articles, for founders, investors and family businesses. We act for both majority and minority shareholders, and we align the agreement with the company’s constitution so the two work together. To put a shareholders agreement in place, contact John Maina, Partner, at OLM Law Advocates LLP.


This article is a general guide only and is not legal advice. Please seek advice on your specific circumstances.

Speak to our corporate team

OLM Law Advocates LLP advises founders, investors and family businesses on shareholders agreements, joint ventures and company governance.

Talk to our team